Craig P. Miller

Principal
Craig P. Miller Image
Direct: 612.632.3258

Support Staff

Terry Griffin
Direct: 612.632.3081

Craig Miller practices primarily in the areas of franchise and distribution litigation and commercial litigation. As a litigator, Craig represents companies and individuals in trial, arbitration, and other civil proceedings throughout the United States. He has represented clients in a wide variety of matters, including franchise disputes, complex business fraud actions, securities fraud claims, trademark and trade dress infringement, noncompete enforcement, shareholder disputes, contract disputes, creditors' remedies, and unfair trade practices claims. Craig is experienced in guiding clients through the dispute resolution process, whether through litigation, arbitration, mediation, or negotiation.

Craig also practices extensively in probate court, helping to resolve disputes over the administration of trusts or estates, will contests, and matters of guardianship and conservatorship. Craig’s familiarity with probate procedure ensures that his clients’ interests are protected.

Craig was chair of Gray Plant Mooty’s Culture & Diversity Committee from 2004-2007.

Experience

  • Enforced post-termination noncompete and non-solicitation agreement, attorneys’ fees provision, and personal guaranty against client’s former franchisee.
  • Obtained order for preliminary injunction in favor of client preventing defendants from infringing upon client’s trademarks, violating noncompete provisions in franchise agreements, and violating post-termination obligations in franchise agreements
  • Obtained dismissal of arbitration action commenced by thirteen on the client’s franchisees (including a Trust created by franchisees for litigation purposes) seeking, in part, a declaratory judgment that the noncompete provisions in their franchise agreements are unenforceable; dismissal of action was granted, in part, on the ground that the claims were improperly joined and that certain franchisees lacked standing to assert claims.
  • Represented client in preliminary injunction action in federal court seeking to enforce terminated franchisee’s post-termination obligations and noncompete agreement, and seeking to prevent franchisee from infringing upon client’s trademarks.
  • Successfully represented client in defense of action commenced by franchisee for encroachment, alleged violations of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, the Washington Consumer Protection Act, breach of contract and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and tortious interference with business expectancy.
  • Obtained preliminary injunction order prohibiting terminated franchisee from infringing upon franchisor’s trademarks and from violating post-termination obligations in franchise agreement; also obtained order holding defendants in contempt for violating court’s preliminary injunction order.
  • Obtained summary judgment on client’s claim for past due fees and liquidated damages in the total amount of $189,789.93; obtained summary judgment on defendant’s counterclaims seeking damages for client’s alleged breaches of franchise agreement; obtained award of attorneys’ fees and costs in favor of client. Bonus of Am., Inc. v. Angel Falls Servs., L.L.C., U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67079 (D. Minn.) (granting preliminary injunction and enforcing in-term noncompete agreement against franchisee and those who acted in concert with the franchisee to evade the noncompete agreement)
  • Bonus of Am., Inc. v. Angel Falls Servs., L.L.C., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53598 (D. Minn.) (granting TRO and enforcing in-term noncompete agreement against franchisee)
  • Pirtek USA, LLC v. Bobby Moore, et al, American Arbitration Association, Case File No. 33 114 00360 07 (AAA) (enforcement of noncompete agreement, attorneys’ fees provision, and personal guaranty against former franchisee)
  • Wilcox et al. v. Pirtek USA, LLC, America Arbitration Association, Case File No. 33 114 Y 00030 05 (AAA) (litigation by and against a group of franchisees concerning pricing of product and enforcement of post-term obligations)
  • Pirtek USA, LLC v. Wilcox, Bus. Franchise Guide (CCH) 13,511 (AAA) (enforcement of franchisor’s noncompete agreement and award of lost profits against former franchisee)
  • Wilcox et al. v. Pirtek USA, LLC, Bus. Franchise Guide (CCH) 13,404 (AAA)
  • Pirtek USA, LLC v. Zaetz, 408 F. Supp. 2d 81 (D. Conn.)
  • Pirtek USA, LLC v. Layer, Bus. Franchise Guide (CCH) 13,357 (D. Fla.) (enforcement of franchisor’s noncompete agreement and other post-termination obligations against former franchisee)
  • Auto-Chlor System of Minnesota, Inc. v. JohnsonDiversey, 328 F. Supp. 2d 980 (D. Minn.)
  • Tatan Management v. Jacfran Corp., 270 F. Supp. 2d 197 (D.P.R.) (order holding that franchisor was justified in terminating franchisee’s franchise rights)
  • RE/MAX North Central, Inc. v. Cook, 64 Fed.Appx. 562 (7th Cir.) (affirming franchisor’s award of damages and attorneys’ fees on trademark infringement claim)
  • RE/MAX North Central, Inc. v. Cook, 272 F.3d 424 (7th Cir.) (affirming courts order granting of preliminary injunction on franchisor’s trademark infringement claim)
back to top