This Securities Briefing provides an overview of the SEC’s proposed rules to amend the disclosure and reporting requirements for smaller companies under the Federal securities laws, including expanding the group of companies eligible for the smaller company requirements and integrating Regulation S-B with Regulation S-K.
This Securities Briefing is intended only as a summary of the SEC rules discussed and you are encouraged to review the full text of the proposed rules.
The SEC has proposed rules to amend the disclosure and reporting requirements for a greater number of smaller companies under the Federal securities laws. The proposed rules create a new term – “smaller reporting company” – to replace the current term “small business issuer.” The proposed rules permit most companies with a public float of less than $75 million to qualify for the simpler or “scaled” disclosure and reporting requirements currently available to small business issuers. The proposed rules provide a revenue test for issuers that do not have a public float or are unable to calculate it. The proposed rules also eliminate the stand-alone Regulation S-B by integrating its requirements into Regulation S-K.
The proposed rules are intended to implement various recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Smaller Public Companies that the SEC established to assess the current regulatory system for smaller public companies. The SEC’s primary objectives for the proposed rules include:
There are currently two categories of smaller companies: “small business issuers” which are companies with both a public float and revenues of less than $25 million and “non-accelerated filers” which are companies that do not qualify as “large accelerated filers” or “accelerated filers.” In general, non-accelerated filers are companies with a public float of less than $75 million. Small business issuers are eligible to make required disclosures based on Regulation S-B using “SB” forms for the periodic reports and registration statements, and have a longer time period for filing their quarterly and annual reports. In addition, non-accelerated filers have a longer time period for becoming compliant with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The proposed rules create a new company category called “smaller reporting company” to replace the current “small business issuer” category plus capture non-accelerated filers. A smaller reporting company is defined as a company that:
A company’s public float is calculated by multiplying the aggregate worldwide number of shares of its voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates by the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average of the bid and asked prices of common equity in the principal market for the common equity. In the case of an IPO, the public float is computed by multiplying the aggregate worldwide number of shares held by non-affiliates before the registration plus the number of shares included in the registration statement by the estimated public offering price of the shares.
The proposed rules provide that the $75 million and $50 million ceilings adjust for inflation every five years beginning on September 1, 2012 to reflect changes in the value of the Personal Consumption Expenditures Chain-Type Price Index.
The current definition of small business issuer excludes companies that are not organized in the United States or Canada, investment companies and asset-backed issuers. The proposed rules continue to exclude investment companies and asset-backed issuers from eligibility to qualify as a smaller reporting company. Any foreign companies that meet the smaller reporting company criteria are eligible to qualify as smaller reporting companies under the proposed rules.
The SEC believes that it is time to eliminate the dual disclosure scheme of Regulations S-B and S-K as being overly complex and a possible deterrent for smaller public companies taking advantage of the scaled disclosure and reporting requirements. The proposed rules integrate Regulation S-B requirements into Regulation S-K largely by adding new subsections to the relevant items of Regulation S-K which contain the applicable provisions of Regulations S-B. Each new subsection will have a heading of “Smaller reporting companies” to make it easier to find the disclosure requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies in each item.
The proposed rules do not propose any major substantive changes to the Regulation S-B items being moved into Regulation S-K. When the disclosure standards of identically numbered items in Regulations S-B and S-K are substantially the same for smaller reporting companies and other companies, there are no changes proposed to the existing Regulation S-K item. The proposed rules make the following specific integration proposals:
The proposed rules allow a smaller reporting company to choose, on an item-by-item basis, to comply with the disclosure standard applicable to smaller reporting companies or the disclosure standard applicable to larger companies. In this way, a smaller reporting company has, in the SEC’s words, the “option to take advantage of the smaller reporting company requirements for one, some, all or none of the items, at its election, in any one filing.” The proposed rules do require smaller reporting companies to provide their financial statements under either Item 310 of Regulation S-K or Regulation S-X for an entire year, and they will not be permitted to switch between the two standards in various filings during the same fiscal year. The SEC intends to provide “maximum flexibility” for smaller reporting companies under this “a la carte” approach.
In addition, a new check box is proposed for the cover page of all filings for smaller reporting companies to check in order to indicate that they are eligible for smaller reporting company status. The SEC intends this approach to balance the interests of investors who wish to determine if a filer is eligible for smaller reporting company status with the need for transparency while not “unduly stigmatizing smaller companies.”
The proposed rules eliminate all forms associated with Regulation S-B (Forms 10-KSB, 10-QSB, 10-SB, SB-1 and SB-2) which will result in a more simplified regulatory scheme for public companies. This change will cause most smaller reporting companies to use Form S-1 to register offerings. The SEC intends that eliminating the “SB” forms will reduce the lack of market acceptance currently associated with smaller filers.
In addition, the proposed rules eliminate the transitional disclosure format currently available to small business issuers for Form SB-1 registration statements and Form 10-KSB because they are not commonly understood and infrequently used.
The proposed rules provide that smaller reporting companies lose eligibility for smaller reporting company status in the first fiscal year following a fiscal year in which their public float is greater than $75 million as of the last business day of the second fiscal quarter. A company that does not file reports as a smaller reporting company will be required to transition to that status in the next fiscal year if its public float falls below $50 million as of the last business day of the second fiscal quarter.
If a company does not have a public float or no public market for its common equity securities exists and its annual revenues are less than $50 million, it will retain smaller reporting company status until its annual revenues exceed $50 million. If an issuer does not qualify for smaller reporting company status under the revenue test, it remains unqualified as a smaller reporting company until its annual revenues are less than $40 million during the previous fiscal year.
The proposed rules provide that the determination as to whether a company qualifies for smaller reporting company status will be made at the beginning of a fiscal year based on the information in Form 10-Q or an initial registration statement, whichever is filed first during the fiscal year.
The SEC release proposing to amend the disclosure and reporting requirements for smaller reporting companies contains a number of questions that interested parties may consider in their comment letters. Comments on the proposed rules are due on or before September 17, 2007.A copy of the proposed SEC rules to require electronic filing of Form D is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov by selecting Proposed Rule: Smaller Reporting Company Regulatory Relief and Simplification or by going to http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2007/33-8819.pdf
Attorneys on the Securities Team include:
J.C. Anderson (612) 632-3002
Lindley S. Branson (612) 632-3024
Maxwell J. Bremer (612) 632-3056
Christopher A. Carlisle (612) 632-3033
Barry F. Clegg (612) 632-3220
Gene H. Hennig (612) 632-3202
Alyssa J. Hirschfeld (612) 632-3316
Inchan Hwang (612) 632-3310
Douglas M. Ramler (612) 632-3324
Michael P. Sullivan, Jr. (612) 632-3350
Daniel R. Tenenbaum (612) 632-3050
Mark D. Williamson (612) 632-3379
Note on Distribution of Securities Briefing: If you have friends or business associates who would like to receive the Gray Plant Mooty Securities Briefing, please forward this to them by e-mail. This newsletter will also be available on the Gray Plant Mooty Web site (www.gpmlaw.com) under “Publications.”
To be added to the distribution list or to update your e-mail address, you may send your name, e-mail address, and company name by e-mail to: Shirley.Johnson@gpmlaw.com or contact Shirley Johnson at (612) 343-3206. If you would like to be removed from our distribution list altogether, please reply to that effect or contact: Shirley.Johnson@gpmlaw.com.
This newsletter is a periodic publication of Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A. that should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only, and you are urged to consult legal counsel concerning your situation and any specific legal questions you may have.
Copyright. 2007. All rights reserved.
Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A.
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. You are urged to consult a lawyer concerning any specific legal questions you may have.
Gray Plant Mooty is recognized as one of the leading corporate law firms in Minnesota and one of the top franchise firms in the world. Our roots go back to 1866. Today, we are a 180-plus attorney, full-service firm with offices in Minneapolis and St. Cloud, Minnesota; Washington, D.C.; and Fargo, North Dakota.