The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA) protects financial institutions that disclose privileged information to their regulators. This protection prevents financial institutions from being forced to choose between making mandatory disclosures of privileged information to their regulators and maintaining the protection of the attorney-client privilege for that information. Specifically, the FDIA in § 1821(t)(2)(A) and § 1828(x) provides that:
Logically, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) should have been added to this list of agencies when the Dodd-Frank Act, which created the CFPB, was enacted, but it was not. To address concerns about this, on January 4, 2012, the CFPB issued Bulletin 12-01 to institutions that it supervises that they need not fear waiver of privilege on privileged material that must be disclosed to the CFPB. This assurance, which seemed to be an unauthorized amendment of the statute, failed to reassure financial institutions and their legal counsel.
The CFPB then adopted a final rule for the protection of attorney-client privileged material and work product privileged material at 12 C.F.R. §§ 1070.47(c) and 1070.48. The rule is substantively identical to § 1828(x), but somewhat broader in scope. Notwithstanding the final rule, financial institutions and their legal counsel remained concerned about the potential for the loss of privilege protection for information disclosed to the CFPB. Accordingly, Congress was asked to provide certainty, and H.R. 4014, which passed Congress and was signed by the president on December 20, 2012, added the CFPB to the list of federal banking agencies included in the privilege protection provisions of the FDIA. Presumably the final rule, now supported by the amended FDIA and by §§ 1022(b)(1) and (c) of the Dodd-Frank Act, which grant the CFPB broad rulemaking and monitoring authority, will be retained and information disclosed to the CFPB will now be afforded the same privilege protection as applies to other banking regulators.
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. You are urged to consult a lawyer concerning any specific legal questions you may have.
Gray Plant Mooty is recognized as one of the leading corporate law firms in Minnesota and one of the top franchise firms in the world. Our roots go back to 1866. Today, we are a 180-plus attorney, full-service firm with offices in Minneapolis and St. Cloud, Minnesota; Washington, D.C.; and Fargo, North Dakota.