Iris Figueroa Rosario

Principal
Iris Figueroa Rosario Image
Direct: 202.295.2204

Support Staff

Diane Pennington
Direct: 202.295.2224

Iris Rosario represents clients in federal and state court cases pertaining to franchise disputes, contract disputes, employment law violations, and other types of commercial civil litigation. She has also represented clients in criminal matters.

In the franchise context, she has handled matters involving underreporting of sales, unapproved products, tax fraud, immigration and employment violations, defamation, trademark violations, and covenants not to compete and, in addition, has drafted numerous settlement agreements on behalf of franchisors. She has also handled a number of standards enforcement cases. Additionally, Iris has provided advice on franchise relationships and has counseled an association of marine manufacturers concerning manufacturer/distributor issues.

Iris is fluent in Spanish.

Experience

  • Prevailed in an arbitration proceeding on behalf of a franchisor client against its franchisee on claims for breach of contract and negligence.  The franchisee alleged that the franchisor had negligently approved the transfer of his franchise and breached the parties’ franchise agreement.  The franchisor filed a motion to dismiss the claims during arbitration, and the arbitrator granted the motion in September 2015.
  • Won a defense verdict for a franchisor client in Pennsylvania after an eight-day jury trial in which the plaintiff sought $7.5 in lost profit damages alleging that the franchisor had delayed the construction of his shop.  Selzer v. Dunkin’ Donuts Inc., et al., No. 2:09-cv-05484-GP (E.D. Pa. Apr. 2, 2015).
  • Prevailed on summary judgment on behalf of a franchisor client. Franchisor terminated the franchise agreement for nonpayment and other breaches of the parties’ agreements. The franchisee had asserted counterclaims against the franchisor for breach of contract, tortious interference, and defamation. H&R Block Tax Services, LLC v. Acevedo-Lopez, No. 12-CV1320-SOW (W.D. Mo. Mar. 5, 2014)
  • Prevailed in an arbitration proceeding on behalf of a franchisor client against its franchisee. Franchisor terminated the parties’ area representative agreement after the franchisee started operating a competing business. The franchisee filed counterclaims alleging, among other things, that the franchisor had violated California’s Franchise Investment Law and California’s Unfair Competition law. Convergence Investments LLC v. ABCSP Inc., Case No. BC473545 (Sup. Ct. Los Angeles 2013)
  • Won a defense verdict on behalf of a software company in a case brought by the client’s competitor. The competitor alleged false advertising concerning the client’s ties to the Democratic party and the sale of its software to political action committees. Aristotle Int’l v. NGP Software, Inc., No. 1:05-cv-01700-TFH (D.C.C. Sept. 2, 2011)
  • Awarded preliminary injunction on behalf of a franchisor client alleging breach of contract and trademark infringement based on franchisee’s violations of the franchisor’s health, safety, and sanitation standards. Dunkin’ Donuts Franchised Rest. LLC v. KEV Enterp., Inc., 634 F. Supp. 2d 1324 (M.D. Fla. 2009)
  • Prevailed on summary judgment on behalf of a franchisor client on franchisee’s claims that franchisor had, among other things, discriminated in violation of California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act and breached the franchise agreement in requiring an English language proficiency assessment as a condition for the transfer of a shop to two buyers. De Walsche v. Togo’s Eateries, Inc., 567 F. Supp. 2d 1198 (C.D. Cal. 2008)
  • Won a defense verdict for a franchisor client in Florida after a six-day jury trial in which the franchisee-plaintiff sought significant lost profit damages alleging that the franchisor had delayed the construction of his shop. 330545 Donuts, Inc. v. Dunkin’ Donuts Inc., No. 99-7002 CACE (18) (Fla. Cir. Ct. July 2007)
  • Prevailed on summary judgment, as a part of a trial team at a previous firm, on behalf of a client against claims that the client had discriminated against an employee on account of her gender and pregnancy status
  • Represented clients on various housing needs before the housing authority of the District of Columbia; worked on cases in conjunction with the D.C. Clinic for the Homeless
  • At previous firm, represented various wireless and broadcast clients on regulatory matters before the U.S. Federal Communications Commission
  • At previous firm, represented clients on a pro bono basis on asylum and other immigration matters before the U.S. Department of Immigration/Homeland Security
Footer Banner
back to top